Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 3(c): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Reference to {{isdaprov|Affiliate}}s can be controversial, particularly for hedge fund managers. More generally, absence of litigation it is roundly pointless repre...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Reference to {{isdaprov|Affiliate}}s can be controversial, particularly for [[hedge fund]] managers.
{{isda 3(c) summ|isdaprov}}
 
More generally, [[absence of litigation]] it is roundly pointless [[representation]], but seeing as (other than unaffiliated Hedge Fund managers) no-one really complains about it, it is best to just leave well alone. It is one for the {{t|life’s too short}} file.
 
But if you do see your life stretching away unendingly to the horizon, and you haven’t got anything else in the calendar in the next half hour, go west, young man. Or woman.

Latest revision as of 15:41, 30 December 2023

Reference to Affiliates can be controversial, particularly for hedge fund managers.

More generally, absence of litigation is a roundly pointless representation, but seeing as (other than unaffiliated hedge fund managers) no-one complains about it, it is best to just leave well alone.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_summ_2002_ISDA_3(c)&oldid=81604"