Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 9(h): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "''There is no strict equivalent in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a fair-arsed attempt at the same thing. <br> Friends of the JC will know that..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Replaced content with "{{isda 9(h) comp|isdaprov}}" Tag: Replaced |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isda 9(h) comp|isdaprov}} | |||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 5 January 2024
There is no strict equivalent to Section 9(h) in the 1992 ISDA. But see Section 2(e), which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing.
Friends of the JC will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always bad, of course — it can be quite good, in fact — characterising, as it does, the sum total of the JC’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case, it leaves something to the imagination and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies every now and then, don’t we?
As you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details as it does, you may find it leads you directly into the “I’m sorry I asked” file.
Are you sorry yet? Well, you did ask.