People you don’t like can still have a point: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The Jordan Peterson principle. The more they get up your nose, the more likely it is they have a point. First, examine your own assumptions. Before you remove the speck on yo...")
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Jordan Peterson principle. The more they get up your nose, the more likely it is they have a point. First, examine your own assumptions.
{{a|maxim|}}{{quote|
''Before you remove the speck on your {{sex|brother}}’s <ref>''Or'' sister’s. :-) </ref> eye, take the log out of your own.''}}
Also known, variously, as the Jordan Peterson principle, the Nigel Farage principle, the Owen Jones principle, the Elizabeth Warren principle, the Donald Trump principle, the Steve Bannon principle and the Greta Thunberg principle.  


Before you remove the speck on your brother’s eye, take the log out of your own.
The more they get up your nose, the more likely it is they have a point. First, examine your own biases and assumptions.


{{t|Maxim}}
And ask yourself: if they are so patently — ''(and here we invite readers to supply their own adjective)'' — then why is it that so many other people can’t see that? Is there something that ''you'' are not seeing?
{{ref}}
{{c|Maxim}}

Latest revision as of 11:14, 30 April 2024


A hearty collection of the JC’s pithiest adages.
Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Before you remove the speck on your brother’s [1] eye, take the log out of your own.

Also known, variously, as the Jordan Peterson principle, the Nigel Farage principle, the Owen Jones principle, the Elizabeth Warren principle, the Donald Trump principle, the Steve Bannon principle and the Greta Thunberg principle.

The more they get up your nose, the more likely it is they have a point. First, examine your own biases and assumptions.

And ask yourself: if they are so patently — (and here we invite readers to supply their own adjective) — then why is it that so many other people can’t see that? Is there something that you are not seeing?

References

  1. Or sister’s. :-)