Donoghue v Stevenson: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cite|Donoghue|Stevenson|1932|AC|532}} is a case so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532. Along with the leaking resevoir of {{casenote|Rylands|Fletcher}} it is one of the founding cases of the law of {{tag|negligence}}.
{{cn}}{{cite|Donoghue|Stevenson|1932|AC|532}} is a case, concerning snails and ginger-beer, which is so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532<ref>Spod fact: I own a copy of the 1932 Appeals Cases, but evidently it has not seen active service in any library populated by live students, apparently has never been read, and so it doesn’t fall open at page 532. Yet. It was quite an expensive experiment to get the wrong answer.</ref>. Along with the leaking resevoir of {{casenote|Rylands|Fletcher}} it is one of the founding cases of the law of [[negligence]].


*Spod fact: I own a copy of the 1932 Appeals Cases, but evidently it has not seen active service in any library populated by live students, apparently has never been read, and so it doesn't fall open at page 532. Yet.
Mrs Donoghue drinking a bottle of ginger beer in a café in Paisley, Renfrewshire. A dead snail was in the bottle. She fell ill, and she sued the ginger beer manufacturer, Mr Stevenson. The House of Lords held that Mr. Stevenson owed Mrs. Donoghue [[duty of care]] which he breached, because it was [[reasonably foreseeable]] that failure to ensure the product’s safety would harm consumers, whom Lord Atkin felt were sufficiently proximate to count as “[[neighbour]]s”.  
 
{{sa}}
*[[Negligence]]
{{ref}}
{{c|tort}}

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman

Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort |

Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 532 is a case, concerning snails and ginger-beer, which is so beloved of law students that the 1932 volume of the Appeals Cases falls open at page 532[1]. Along with the leaking resevoir of Rylands v Fletcher it is one of the founding cases of the law of negligence.

Mrs Donoghue drinking a bottle of ginger beer in a café in Paisley, Renfrewshire. A dead snail was in the bottle. She fell ill, and she sued the ginger beer manufacturer, Mr Stevenson. The House of Lords held that Mr. Stevenson owed Mrs. Donoghue duty of care which he breached, because it was reasonably foreseeable that failure to ensure the product’s safety would harm consumers, whom Lord Atkin felt were sufficiently proximate to count as “neighbours”.

See also

References

  1. Spod fact: I own a copy of the 1932 Appeals Cases, but evidently it has not seen active service in any library populated by live students, apparently has never been read, and so it doesn’t fall open at page 532. Yet. It was quite an expensive experiment to get the wrong answer.