Template:M summ GMSLA Agreement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "The prevailing market standard {{tag|English law}} {{tag|stock lending}} master agreement. Compare with the {{msla}}. How do you say it? Jimzler|However you like, basically..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The prevailing market standard | The prevailing market standard [[English law]] [[stock lending]] master agreement. Compare with the {{msla}}. | ||
How do you say it? [[Jimzler|However you like, basically]]. The GMSLA is an agreement once drafted by a [[magic circle law firm]] but whose carriage nowadays is almost exclusively handled by inhouse lawyers and negotiators, to the point where seeking external advice on what a given provision means is a bad idea, because private practice lawyers will have far less of a clue — having likely never looked at a {{gmsla}} than will their inhouse clients who ask the question. This won’t stop them asking, of course. | How do you say it? [[Jimzler|However you like, basically]]. The GMSLA is an agreement once drafted by a [[magic circle law firm]] but whose carriage nowadays is almost exclusively handled by inhouse lawyers and negotiators, to the point where seeking external advice on what a given provision means is a bad idea, because private practice lawyers will have far less of a clue — having likely never looked at a {{gmsla}} than will their inhouse clients who ask the question. This won’t stop them asking, of course. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
The prevailing market standard English law stock lending master agreement. Compare with the Master Securities Lending Agreement.
How do you say it? However you like, basically. The GMSLA is an agreement once drafted by a magic circle law firm but whose carriage nowadays is almost exclusively handled by inhouse lawyers and negotiators, to the point where seeking external advice on what a given provision means is a bad idea, because private practice lawyers will have far less of a clue — having likely never looked at a 2010 GMSLA than will their inhouse clients who ask the question. This won’t stop them asking, of course.