No-fault termination: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}Conclusion of one’s | {{g}}Conclusion of one’s [[contract]]ual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a [[contract]] by delivering notice, and announcing, ''apropos'' nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on. | ||
To be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]]. | To be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]]. |
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
Conclusion of one’s contractual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.
To be contrasted with termination with extreme prejudice.
Fun fact: There is no means to terminate an ISDA Master Agreement on notice. Either you go Full Metal Jacket — and even then you can’t finally kill it — or Hotel California. That’s right: without some special pleading — involving garlic, wooden stakes and the agreement of the parties, an ISDA cannot die.