Tort: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

The basic principles of tort
A Jolly Contrarian guide to loving thy neighbour™

Contract — quasi-contract — quasi-agency — tort — restitution Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Tort Contract Restitution

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.

You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.

But don’t be a nuisance.^[1] Unless you’re playing cricket.

C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.

↑
Here all week, folks!
This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-not a [[torte]].
+{{a|tort|}}Not a [[torte]]. <br />
-Nor, for that matter, a breach of {{tag|contract}}.
+Nor, for that matter, a breach of [[contract]].
+You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.
+But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you’re playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].
+C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
+{{ref}}