Template:Healthcare serial murder capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{L3}}There is an unusual series of deaths or medical incidents that significantly exceed statistical averages, and for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation <li>A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents<li>There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients<li>There are several pieces of ''circumstantial evidence'' that are each consistent with the carer’s involvement in..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{L3}} | {{L3}}'''Situation''': An unusual increase in deaths or medical incidents at a controlled hospital or care facility exceeding statistical averages for that facility and for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation. <li>'''Suspect''': A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents.<li>'''No direct evidence''': There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients.<li>'''“Small arrows”''': There are many pieces of ''weak'' [[circumstantial evidence]] pointing to (or at least [[consistent with]]) the carer’s involvement, but which, when taken individually, do not ''strongly'' implicate the carer.<li>'''No motive''': The suspect has no apparent motive.<li>'''No [[criminal propensity]]''': The suspect has no record of violence, antisocial behaviour or mental illness other than the alleged offending. | ||
</ol> | </ol> |
Latest revision as of 12:14, 27 August 2024
- Situation: An unusual increase in deaths or medical incidents at a controlled hospital or care facility exceeding statistical averages for that facility and for which there is no obvious “innocent” explanation.
- Suspect: A given carer or medical professional was present for all the incidents.
- No direct evidence: There is no reliable direct evidence of the identified carer actually harming any of the patients.
- “Small arrows”: There are many pieces of weak circumstantial evidence pointing to (or at least consistent with) the carer’s involvement, but which, when taken individually, do not strongly implicate the carer.
- No motive: The suspect has no apparent motive.
- No criminal propensity: The suspect has no record of violence, antisocial behaviour or mental illness other than the alleged offending.