Template:OSLA - FWMD: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Call that a short? That’s not a short. ''This'' is a short.| documentation= Vague, arcane, outdated and no netting ai..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| imagetype=jpg| tagline= Call that a [[short]]? That’s not a short. ''This'' is a short.| documentation= Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting]] airbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh GMSLA.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The ''lender'' net borrows from the ''borrower''. ''Nice''.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anachronistic and no netting, so [[GameStop]] freakout territory.| frightscore=5}}
{{fwmdtt|nickname=OSLA| image=PK machine gun.jpg| tagline= Call that a [[short]]? That’s not a short. ''This'' is a short.| documentation= Vague, arcane, outdated and no [[netting]] airbags.| docscore=4| amendability= Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh GMSLA.|amendscore=2| collateral= Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything.| collateralscore =1| transferability= bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus.| transferscore =0| leverage=Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The ''lender'' net borrows from the ''borrower''. ''Nice''.| leveragescore =1| frightometer= Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anachronistic and no netting, so [[GameStop]] freakout territory.| frightscore=5}}

Latest revision as of 09:15, 30 September 2024

Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®



OSLA


Call that a short? That’s not a short. This is a short.


Docs Vague, arcane, outdated and no netting airbags. 4
Amendability Bilateral, so yes, in theory — but more likely to tip out and sign up a fresh GMSLA. 2
Collateral Yes. Could be stocks, bonds — anything. 1
Transferability bilateral. Homey don’t ride that bus. 0
Leverage Fully cash collateralised, but a bonus point for the contra-flow collateral haircut. The lender net borrows from the borrower. Nice. 1
Fright-o-meter Generally sleepy “pluming of the financial, system” material, but shortsville, generally anachronistic and no netting, so GameStop freakout territory. 5