Template:Agent representations: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Representations and warranties by agent===
====Representations by agent on principal’s behalf====
You might occasionally hear, from the counsel of an investment manager, a protest when you ask it to make representations on behalf of a principal.
{{drop|Y|ou might occasionally}} hear, from an [[investment manager]], a protest when you ask it to make [[Representations|representations]] on behalf of its [[principal]].


“But I cannot,” she might say, “for I do not know if this is true unless the principal has told me it is true. I cannot assume personal liability for my principal’s obligations. I am but an agent.”
{{quote|
“But I cannot,” she might say, “for I do not know if this is true unless the principal has told me it is true. I cannot assume personal liability for my principal’s obligations. I am but an [[agent]].”}}


You must answer this firmly, along the following lines:
You must answer this firmly, along the following lines:
{{quote|
Now, look. ''No-one'' is asking you to assume personal liability for your [[principal]]’s obligations. We are asking the ''[[principal]]'' to do that. It is the principal’s responsibility under the [[contract]]. Ordinarily, of course, we would ask the principal directly, but it didn’t show up, and sent you here on its behalf instead. So, we are asking ''you'' to communicate these representations to us, ''on your principal’s behalf''.


“No-one is asking you to assume personal liability for your {{t|principal}}’s obligations. We are asking the ''{{t|principal}}'' to assume liability for them. It is the principal’s responsibility under the {{t|contract}}. Ordinarily, of course, we would ask the principal directly, but it didn’t show up, and sent you instead. So, we are asking you to communicate these representations on your principal’s behalf.
Now, you might say you don’t know whether these representations are true, or that you are not sure whether you are authorised to make them on your client’s behalf. But think twice before admitting that, because, really, you ''should'' have asked or, better still, explained to your client that a condition of signing [[master trading agreement]]s is that you will have to make uncontroversial representations about your own capacity, authority, competence and sanity.


“Now, you might say you don’t know whether these representations are true, or that you are not sure whether you are authorised to make them on your client’s behalf. But think twice before admitting that because, really, you ''should'' have asked or, better still, explained to your client that a condition of signing master trading agreements is that you will have to make uncontroversial representations about your own capacity, authority, competence and sanity.”
If you are still not comfortable proceeding, the answer is not to do without the representations: it is to do without the master trading agreement.}}
 
“If you are still not comfortable proceeding, the answer is not to do without the representations: it is to do without the master trading agreement.
 
“So what’s it going to be, punk?”<ref>You might think about leaving that last line out, but 10/10 for style if you do decide to use it.</ref>

Latest revision as of 13:44, 15 October 2024

Representations by agent on principal’s behalf

You might occasionally hear, from an investment manager, a protest when you ask it to make representations on behalf of its principal.

“But I cannot,” she might say, “for I do not know if this is true unless the principal has told me it is true. I cannot assume personal liability for my principal’s obligations. I am but an agent.”

You must answer this firmly, along the following lines:

Now, look. No-one is asking you to assume personal liability for your principal’s obligations. We are asking the principal to do that. It is the principal’s responsibility under the contract. Ordinarily, of course, we would ask the principal directly, but it didn’t show up, and sent you here on its behalf instead. So, we are asking you to communicate these representations to us, on your principal’s behalf.

Now, you might say you don’t know whether these representations are true, or that you are not sure whether you are authorised to make them on your client’s behalf. But think twice before admitting that, because, really, you should have asked or, better still, explained to your client that a condition of signing master trading agreements is that you will have to make uncontroversial representations about your own capacity, authority, competence and sanity.

If you are still not comfortable proceeding, the answer is not to do without the representations: it is to do without the master trading agreement.