From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| The famous "{{cobsprov|elective ECP}}" categorisation. As you'll see from the snapshot below:
| | #redirect[[Eligible counterparty - FCA Rulebook Term]] |
| *Many {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s are also {{cassprov|per se eligible counterparties}} - but not all.
| |
| *Those {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s that are not {{cobsprov|per se eligible ECP}}s - ie that are {{cobsprov|elective ECP}}s - can only be treated as {{cobsprov|ECP}}s if ''they'' have requested this categorisation. Now one might, of course, gently put that idea in such a client's head: nothing wrong with that. Politely suggesting an elective ECP might wish to think about requesting an upgrade is one thing - but one cannot unilaterally categorise an elective ECP as an ECPwithout them first requesting it.
| |
| *an "elective professional client" (ie one is able to be ugraded from retail to professional) cannot further request to be treated as an {{cobsprov|ECP}}.
| |
| | |
| {{cobssnap|3.6.4}}
| |
| | |
| {{anat|cobs}}
| |
Latest revision as of 09:42, 3 December 2024