Surety: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An old word meaning a guarantee.") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An old word meaning a [[guarantee]]. | {{a|banking|}}An old word meaning a [[guarantee]], or the provider of one (now more commonly known as a [[guarantor]]). | ||
There are those who will tell you that a [[guarantor]] and a [[surety]] are different things, though when pressed to explain how, they will struggle. | |||
For example, this, and I quote: | |||
{{quote|“The basic difference between the two is that a suretyship cannot exist without a principal obligation by a principal debtor, for example, the obligation to pay the bank, and a guarantee is an undertaking by a guarantor (you) to pay or fulfill an obligation to a creditor (bank) upon the occurrence of a certain event.”<ref>https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/really-difference-between-guarantee-suretyship-marianne-du-toit/</ref>}} | |||
We are scarcely the wiser. How can a guarantee exist without a principal obligation (the thing being guaranteed) owed a principal debtor (the “obligor”) to a creditor (the “beneficiary”) by some other party (the “guarantor” or “surety”)? | |||
No less an authority that Allen ''and'' Overy — yes, both of them — tell us<ref>https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/blogs/compact-contract/the-difference-between-suretyship-guarantees-and-demand-guarantees></ref> that in fact a suretyship is a ''type'' of guarantee — a weaker one — to unfavourably contrasted with a [[demand guarantee|“demand” guarantee]]: | |||
{{quote|The differences between the two are important. With a suretyship guarantee, equity will intervene to protect a guarantor in some circumstances (for example, if the underlying contractual obligations which it has guaranteed have been increased without the guarantor’s consent). A surety’s obligations are also secondary: the beneficiary of the guarantee must first establish the main obligor’s liability and default. With a [[demand guarantee]] payment is only conditional on the beneficiary serving a demand in the required form (although this can be made conditional on an event happening). Normally, demand guarantees are not subject to the equitable defences that a suretyship guarantee is.}} | |||
Our conclusion? Anything meant in a document by surety — one person’s acceptance of another’s liabilities to a third person — can comfortably be captured by the word “guarantee”. | |||
We have no doubt others, down there in the weeds, will differ: but if the prolific thought-pieces pressed to the ear of the internet are anything to go by — of which our own humble offering is but the latest — it won’t be on any strong principle. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
{{ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:11, 18 September 2023
|
Banking basics
A recap of a few things you’d think financial professionals ought to know
|
An old word meaning a guarantee, or the provider of one (now more commonly known as a guarantor).
There are those who will tell you that a guarantor and a surety are different things, though when pressed to explain how, they will struggle.
For example, this, and I quote:
“The basic difference between the two is that a suretyship cannot exist without a principal obligation by a principal debtor, for example, the obligation to pay the bank, and a guarantee is an undertaking by a guarantor (you) to pay or fulfill an obligation to a creditor (bank) upon the occurrence of a certain event.”[1]
We are scarcely the wiser. How can a guarantee exist without a principal obligation (the thing being guaranteed) owed a principal debtor (the “obligor”) to a creditor (the “beneficiary”) by some other party (the “guarantor” or “surety”)?
No less an authority that Allen and Overy — yes, both of them — tell us[2] that in fact a suretyship is a type of guarantee — a weaker one — to unfavourably contrasted with a “demand” guarantee:
The differences between the two are important. With a suretyship guarantee, equity will intervene to protect a guarantor in some circumstances (for example, if the underlying contractual obligations which it has guaranteed have been increased without the guarantor’s consent). A surety’s obligations are also secondary: the beneficiary of the guarantee must first establish the main obligor’s liability and default. With a demand guarantee payment is only conditional on the beneficiary serving a demand in the required form (although this can be made conditional on an event happening). Normally, demand guarantees are not subject to the equitable defences that a suretyship guarantee is.
Our conclusion? Anything meant in a document by surety — one person’s acceptance of another’s liabilities to a third person — can comfortably be captured by the word “guarantee”.
We have no doubt others, down there in the weeds, will differ: but if the prolific thought-pieces pressed to the ear of the internet are anything to go by — of which our own humble offering is but the latest — it won’t be on any strong principle.