Nu: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
If you’ve made the mistake of talking about [[nu]] you have shown yourself to be a classicist, and not a derivative salesperson. [[Nu]] is the Greek equivalent of “V”, but not the ''{{tag|Greeks}}'' equivalent of “V”. But derivative salespeople talk about [[vega]], if they’re being honest, and [[leveraged alpha]] if they’re not. Not [[nu]].
{{g}}If you’ve made the mistake of talking about [[nu]] ([[ν]]) on a trading floor you have shown yourself to be better trained in classics than [[derivative]]s. In fairness it is a transition most derivative [[salespeople]] must make after they leave Cambridge, so you should not feel too bad about it. All it indicates is how far you have to go.  
 
[[Nu]] ([[ν]]) is the [[Greeks|Greek]] equivalent of “V”, but not the ''[[Greeks]]'' equivalent of “V”. [[Derivative]] salespeople talk about [[vega]], if they’re being honest, and [[leveraged alpha]] if they’re not. Not [[nu]].


{{greeks}}
{{greeks}}

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

If you’ve made the mistake of talking about nu (ν) on a trading floor you have shown yourself to be better trained in classics than derivatives. In fairness it is a transition most derivative salespeople must make after they leave Cambridge, so you should not feel too bad about it. All it indicates is how far you have to go.

Nu (ν) is the Greek equivalent of “V”, but not the Greeks equivalent of “V”. Derivative salespeople talk about vega, if they’re being honest, and leveraged alpha if they’re not. Not nu.

See also