Poretta v Superior Dowel Company: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 19:20, 19 December 2020

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.

Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman

Click ᐅ to expand: Case notes

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A contemporary American case on undisclosed agency, undisclosed principals and so on, containing a lengthy disquisition on the merits (few) of Lord Tenterden’s rule from Thompson v Davenport and (great) of Parke B’s scornful disagreement with that dictum, as set out in Heald v Kenworthy.

(transcript here).

Revision as of 15:16, 14 November 2016 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,426 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 19:20, 19 December 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,426 edits m Amwelladmin moved page Poretta v Superior Dowel Company - Case Note to Poretta v Superior Dowel Company
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A contemporary American case on [[Undisclosed agent\|undisclosed agency]], [[undisclosed principal]]s and so on, containing a lengthy disquisition on the merits (few) of Lord Tenterden’s rule from {{casenote\|Thompson\|Davenport}} and (great) of Parke B’s scornful disagreement with that dictum, as set out in {{casenote\|Heald\|Kenworthy}}.		{{cn}}A contemporary American case on [[Undisclosed agent\|undisclosed agency]], [[undisclosed principal]]s and so on, containing a lengthy disquisition on the merits (few) of Lord Tenterden’s rule from {{casenote\|Thompson\|Davenport}} and (great) of Parke B’s scornful disagreement with that dictum, as set out in {{casenote\|Heald\|Kenworthy}}.

	(transcript [http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1957/137-a-2d-361-0.html here]).		(transcript [http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1957/137-a-2d-361-0.html here]).