|
|
| (15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ===Calculating {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}}s and {{csaprov|Return Amount}}s===
| |
| ====Delivery Amounts====
| |
| '''First''': work out your '''{{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}}'''. This is: <br>
| |
| ''{{csaprov|Transferee}}’s {{csaprov|Exposure}} + Net {{csaprov|Independent Amount}}s (IF ANY)<ref>In the {{2016csa}} there really shouldn't be {{tag|IA}} as it kind of defeats the regulatory goal of marking actual exposures to market, but there may be, since ISDA caved and retrofitted the CSA with a an Independent Amount section</ref>''
| |
| '''Second''': calculate the {{csaprov|Value}} of the {{csaprov|Transferor}}’s {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}. This is basically the prevailing value of the {{csaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} (and income on it) that the {{csaprov|Transferor}} has ponied up at that time. <br>
| |
| '''Third''': Deduct the {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}} from the {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}}.
| |
| '''Fourth''': If the difference:
| |
| :#it is less than zero, KEEP QUIET. If you are lucky, the other guy won’t ask you for a {{csaprov|Return Amount}}.
| |
| :#it is more than zero but less than the {{csaprov|Minimum Transfer Amount}}, also KEEP QUIET. No {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} for you today.
| |
| :#it is more than the {{csaprov|Minimum Transfer Amount}} you can demand the whole amount.
| |
| ===={{csaprov|Return Amount}}====
| |
| Basically the converse of a {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}}. In this case you deduct the {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} from the {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}}.
| |
|
| |
|
| ''Bonus learning for free: In a subtraction, the sum being subtracted is the [[subtrahend]] and the sum it is being subtracted from is the [[minuend]].'' <br>
| |