Epistemology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The branch of [[philosophy]] concerned with knowledge — and certainty. [[Lawyers]] are, by nature, [[Cartesian]] in their outlook. By disposition they are [[inclined]] to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence. | {{a|philosophy|}}The branch of [[philosophy]] concerned with knowledge — and certainty. [[Lawyers]] are, by nature, [[Cartesian]] in their outlook. By disposition they are [[inclined]] to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[René Descartes]] | *[[René Descartes]] | ||
*[[Jurisprudence]] | |||
*[[Metaphysics]] | *[[Metaphysics]] | ||
*[[Ontology]] and the [[profound ontological uncertainty]] that accompanies the practice of the law. | *[[Ontology]] and the [[profound ontological uncertainty]] that accompanies the practice of the law. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:28, 30 December 2020
|
Philosophy
|
The branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge — and certainty. Lawyers are, by nature, Cartesian in their outlook. By disposition they are inclined to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence.
See also
- René Descartes
- Jurisprudence
- Metaphysics
- Ontology and the profound ontological uncertainty that accompanies the practice of the law.