MiFID 2: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|mifid2}}Like [[MiFID]], only better.
{{a|mifid2|}}
[[MiFID]]’s difficult second album.
===Style===
*Make sure you get the CHiPs-style capitalisation right.
*Is it “[[MiFID 2]]” or “[[MiFID II]]”? It is important to get the form right.  One view is it must be roman numerals because, well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy. Another is that for exactly that reason, it must be [[MiFID 2]].  
===Substance===
It's a directive about {{Mifid2prov|financial instrument}}s, so what exactly counts as a [[financial instrument]] is of some interest, right?


Pressing issue of the day: is it “[[MiFID 2]]” or “[[MiFID II]]”?
{{sa}}
 
Important to get the form right.
 
One view is it must be roman numerals because - well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy.
 
I SAY THAT IS ALL THE MORE REASON IT SHOULD BE [[MiFID 2]].
 
Bite me.
 
 
{{seealso}}
*[[MiFID]]
*[[MiFID]]
*[[Circle of delegation]]
*[[Circle of delegation]]

Latest revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020

MiFID 2 Anatomy™
MiFID 2: Less fondly known as EU Directive 2014/65/EU (EUR Lex) | MiFID 1Articles: 16(7) (Recording of Communications)
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


MiFID’s difficult second album.

Style

  • Make sure you get the CHiPs-style capitalisation right.
  • Is it “MiFID 2” or “MiFID II”? It is important to get the form right. One view is it must be roman numerals because, well, Star Wars, and not Police Academy. Another is that for exactly that reason, it must be MiFID 2.

Substance

It's a directive about financial instruments, so what exactly counts as a financial instrument is of some interest, right?

See also