From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|6(b)(iii)|2002|6(b)(iii)|1992}}
| | #redirect[[Right to Terminate Following Termination Event - ISDA Provision]] |
| {{becareful}}
| |
| Exercise Caution here: Under the {{1992ma}} version, if your {{isdaprov|Failure To Pay}} also amounts to an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} it is deemed to be an Illegality, and if there are two {{isdaprov|Affected Parties}} there is a signficant delay in your ability to close out.
| |
| | |
| ===Differences between {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}}===
| |
| Note also that reference to Illegality has been excised from the {{2002ma}} version.
| |
| | |
| Per Mr Firth’s bible, it was changed because it was found to be difficult in practice to implement a transfer or amendment after an {{isdaprov|Illegality}}. Also, it could be that people realised that if an {{isdaprov|Illegality}} occurred you don’t want to have to wait 30 days to terminate, especially since you cannot rely on {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} to withhold payments in the mean time.
| |
| | |
| This was raised at a recent last {{ISDA}} meeting: {{A&O}} pointed out that there was a template amendment agreement to change the {{1992ma}} {{isdaprov|Illegality}} definition into the {{2002ma}} (if you don’t want to use the 2002 to start with).
| |
Latest revision as of 17:26, 14 August 2024