Balfour v Balfour: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "In which Lord Atkin himself — yea, he of {{casenote|Donoghue|Stephenson}} — entirely gets wrong the basic tenets about the formation of a {{t|contract}}. If I may be so bo..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Amwelladmin moved page Balfour v Balfour - Case Note to Balfour v Balfour |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In which Lord Atkin himself — yea, he of {{casenote|Donoghue| | {{cn}}In which Lord Atkin himself — yea, he of {{casenote|Donoghue|Stevenson}} — entirely gets wrong the basic tenets about the formation of a {{t|contract}}. If I may be so bold. | ||
{{Seealso}} | {{Seealso}} | ||
*[[Intention to create legal relations]] | *[[Intention to create legal relations]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 19 December 2020
|
The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
|
In which Lord Atkin himself — yea, he of Donoghue v Stevenson — entirely gets wrong the basic tenets about the formation of a contract. If I may be so bold.