Discourse on the Method: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Rene Descartes]]’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by | {{a|philosophy|}}[[Rene Descartes]]’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by {{buchstein}}<ref>[[Discourse on Intercourse]].</ref>, who proved that there must be at least three people in the universe, and since they were all engaged on a [[conference call]], God was almost certainly not one of them. | ||
“God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do [[conference call]]s.What would be the point?” | “God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do [[conference call]]s. What would be the point?” | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Discourse on Intercourse]] | *[[Discourse on Intercourse]] | ||
*[[Otto Büchstein]] | *[[Otto Büchstein]] | ||
{{c|Philosophy}} | {{c|Philosophy}}{{c|Metaphysics}} | ||
{{ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:18, 8 April 2022
|
Philosophy
|
Rene Descartes’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by Büchstein[1], who proved that there must be at least three people in the universe, and since they were all engaged on a conference call, God was almost certainly not one of them.
“God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do conference calls. What would be the point?”