Template:Third law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[JC]]’s [[third law of worker entropy]]: There is a 100% correlation between | '''The [[JC]]’s [[third law of worker entropy]]''', also known as “the [[law of inevitable tedium]]”: There is a 100% correlation between | ||
:(i) activities that, however important they might seem, in fact have no value, and | :(i) activities that, however important they might seem, in fact have no value, and | ||
:(ii) activities that are [[tedious]]. | :(ii) activities that are [[tedious]]. | ||
[[All other things being equal]], if an activity is [[tedious]], it is ''[[waste]]ful''. If it is wasteful, you ''shouldn’t do it''. | [[All other things being equal]], if an activity is [[tedious]], it is ''[[waste]]ful''. If it is wasteful, you ''shouldn’t do it''. |
Latest revision as of 12:14, 9 November 2022
The JC’s third law of worker entropy, also known as “the law of inevitable tedium”: There is a 100% correlation between
- (i) activities that, however important they might seem, in fact have no value, and
- (ii) activities that are tedious.
All other things being equal, if an activity is tedious, it is wasteful. If it is wasteful, you shouldn’t do it.