Such consent not to be unreasonably withheld: Difference between revisions
From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| When can one withhold one’s consent? When your watchword is “[[noli mentula esse]]”.
| | #redirect[[Prior consent]] |
| | |
| That's when. As was illustrated in the recent case of {{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}}.
| |
| | |
| If the purpose of a covenant is for a party to achieve a certain purpose, or prevent a certain outcome, then if you use the covenant to achieve some other purpose, you’re likely to get yourself in trouble.
| |
| | |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *[[Don’t take a piece of paper to a knife fight]]
| |
| *[[Noli mentula esse]]
| |
| *{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} [2018] EWHC 504 (Comm)
| |
| *{{casenote|AP Picture Houses|Wednesbury}}
| |
Latest revision as of 09:35, 17 January 2023