Contractual mistake: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Gates.png|thumb|right|A stupid [[mistake]], yesterday.]]
[[File:Gates.png|thumb|right|A stupid [[mistake]], yesterday.]]
An area of {{tag|contract}} law beloved of university professors and their students.
An area of [[contract]] law beloved of university professors and their students.
*[[Unilateral mistake]]
*[[Unilateral mistake]]
*[[Mutual mistake]]
*[[Mutual mistake]]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

A stupid mistake, yesterday.

An area of contract law beloved of university professors and their students.

One thing to be clear: if you make an error what you agree with your counterparty, but your counterparty understands it and agrees it — that’s not a contractual mistake in a legal sense. It's just your screw up, and you’re stuck with it, barring the good graces of a beneign counterparty who might deign to let you out. You did a bad trade, hotshot.

See also

  • Counterparts and Confirmations (Section 9(e))in the ISDA master agreement, addressing the question who is the contracting party and what counts as a mistake. Trader is; settlements and confirmations dude in ops isn't.