Credit Support Document - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Replaced content with "{{nman|isda|2002|Credit Support Document}}"
Tags: Replaced Manual revert
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|Credit Support Document }}
{{nman|isda|2002|Credit Support Document}}
Being the document by which {{isdaprov|Credit Support}} is provided by a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}.
===The {{csa}} is ''not'' a Credit Support Document...===
Note that a {{tag|CSA}} is '''not''' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}, and you should not list it as one in {{isdaprov|Part 4}} of the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, however satisfying it might be to do so. I mean it sounds like one, right? But no: the counterparty cannot be its own {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}. The {{csa}} is, rather, a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. This is rather important to the whole issue of [[close-out netting]]. Deep [[ISDA lore]].
 
===... But the {{nycsa}} ''is'' a Credit Support Document===
Because it is a {{sfca}} arrangement and not a {{ttca}}, transfer of credit support under a {{nycsa}} does not change the net liabilities between the parties, the {{nycsa}} (and its regulatory VM successor, the {{nyvmcsa}} is a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} and not a transaction under the {{isdama}}. Fun, huh?
 
===[[Guarantees]] under the {{isdama}}: why {{isdaprov|Transaction}}-specific {{isdaprov|guarantee}}s don't work===
{{isdaguaranteewarning}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 12:02, 28 August 2024

2002 ISDA Master Agreement

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Credit Support Document in a Nutshell

The JC’s Nutshell summary of this term has moved uptown to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get it here. Sign up at Substack. You can even ask questions! Ask about it here.

Original text

Credit Support Document” means any agreement or instrument that is specified as such in this Agreement.

See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Resources and Navigation

Index: Click to expand:

Comparisons

No changes between the versions of this rather unnecessary definition. The men and women of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ must have stood back and admired the handiwork of their 1992 forebears, high-fived each other and gone, “nice job, dudes and dudettes”.

Basics

Being the document by which “Credit Support” is provided by a Credit Support Provider.

So one large and oddly baffling question is this:

Is a Credit Support Annex a “Credit Support Document”? It is, right? Isn’t it?

Well, some are, and some aren’t. Here is where JC gets all squirrelly on you. We can say this:

A New York law CSA, being a “security interest” collateral arrangement — say what you will about rehypothecationis a Credit Support Document.

An English law CSA, being a “title transfer” collateral arrangement, is not a Credit Support Document.

An English law Credit Support Deed, which is a “security interest” collateral arrangement but does not have a rehypothecation right, is ... go on, see if you can guess:

Oh, all right, an English Law Credit Support Deed is a Credit Support Document, too.

If you want to know why this is the case — well, be a sport and stump up for the premium content version and then you can find out!

Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇

See also

References