Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law,..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Replaced content with "{{isda 4 summ|isdaprov}}" Tag: Replaced |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{isda 4 summ|isdaprov}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 13 October 2023
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t).
These are the dull agreements — which by and large don’t justify close-out.