Template:Isda Affected Transactions summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Note that for {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Events}} and {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, all {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} are automatically caught, and if you want to cap..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seeing how third party [[credit support]] generally works under an {{isdama}} — it only comes into play once {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}s have been closed out, and there ''are'' no Transactions left, Affected or otherwise<ref>The notable exception being a [[New York law]] [[Credit Support Annex]] of course.</ref> this does seem a rather fussy detail; all the more so now in the age of regulatory [[variation margin]]. I mean, who provides [[credit support]] for individual {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s under a master agreement specifically designed to achieve cross-transactional [[closeout netting]]? | |||
Latest revision as of 16:13, 5 January 2024
Seeing how third party credit support generally works under an ISDA Master Agreement — it only comes into play once {{{{{1}}}|Transaction}}s have been closed out, and there are no Transactions left, Affected or otherwise[1] this does seem a rather fussy detail; all the more so now in the age of regulatory variation margin. I mean, who provides credit support for individual Transactions under a master agreement specifically designed to achieve cross-transactional closeout netting?
- ↑ The notable exception being a New York law Credit Support Annex of course.