Template:Reverse repos: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "===And a ''reverse'' repo is?=== A '''reverse repo''' is just a repo viewed from the {{gmraprov|Buyer}}’s and not the Seller’s perspective. {{gmraprov|Buyer}} gets..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===And a ''reverse'' repo is?===
===And a ''reverse'' Repo is?===
A '''[[reverse repo]]''' is just a [[repo]] viewed from the {{gmraprov|Buyer}}’s and not the Seller’s perspective. {{gmraprov|Buyer}} gets in cash, gives up bonds. You don’t hear much taljk about a ''reverse'' [[Buy/Sell Back Transaction - GMRA Provision|Buy/Sell Back Transaction]], but probably only because this sounds, on its face, idiotic, rather than merely idiotic if you spend the idlest moment thinking about it and the one thing we know financial services professionals like less than idly thinking about things is looking idiotic without having to even think about things.
A [[Reverse Repurchase Transaction - GMRA Provision|reverse Repo]]is just a [[repo]] viewed from the {{gmraprov|Buyer}}’s and not the {{gmraprov|Seller}}’s perspective. {{gmraprov|Buyer}} gets in cash, sells bonds; later, buys bonds, givers back cash.  
 
You don’t hear much talk about a “reverse [[Buy/Sell Back Transaction - GMRA Provision|Buy/Sell Back Transaction]], but probably only because this sounds, on its face, idiotic, rather than merely idiotic if you spend the idlest moment thinking about it and the one thing we know [[Salespeople|financial services professionals]] like less than idly thinking about things is looking idiotic without having, even idly, to think about things.

Latest revision as of 14:43, 29 June 2020

And a reverse Repo is?

A “reverse Repo” is just a repo viewed from the Buyer’s and not the Seller’s perspective. Buyer gets in cash, sells bonds; later, buys bonds, givers back cash.

You don’t hear much talk about a “reverse Buy/Sell Back Transaction”, but probably only because this sounds, on its face, idiotic, rather than merely idiotic if you spend the idlest moment thinking about it and the one thing we know financial services professionals like less than idly thinking about things is looking idiotic without having, even idly, to think about things.