Template:Rep no violation: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Blanked the page)
Tag: Blanking
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
No, it doesn’t make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing [[warranty]] that you have not [[Breach of contract|breached this agreement]]. That is tantamount to a {{repprov|no event of default}} rep — so you should already have it — and as canvassed in that very article, that [[representation]] is, in any case, a big old waste of time. If I ''tell'' you I have not breached the agreement, but in actual fact, I ''have'', in what way are you in a better position than if I ''didn't'' tell you that? <br>
 

Latest revision as of 08:48, 29 May 2023