Template:Gmsla 8 comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Observers will note: in the {{pgmsla}} there is no equivalent of the {{gmsla}}’s Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.5}} dealing with what to do with {{gmslaprov|Letters of Credit}}, and no equivalent of the {{gmsla}}’s Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}} requiring the delivery obligations to be reciprocal. | Observers will note: in the {{pgmsla}} there is no equivalent of the {{gmsla}}’s Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.5}} dealing with what to do with {{gmslaprov|Letters of Credit}}, and no equivalent of the {{gmsla}}’s Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}} requiring the delivery obligations to be reciprocal. | ||
Instead, we assume to bulk out a paragraph which otherwise seems a bit textually anaemic, {{islacds}} went to town adding a couple of new paragraphs | Instead, we assume to bulk out a paragraph which otherwise seems a bit textually anaemic, when drafting paragraph {{pgmslaprov|8}} of the {{pgmsla}} {{islacds}} went to town adding a couple of new paragraphs — {{pgmslaprov|8.3}} and {{pgmslaprov|8.4}} — that boast quite some textual complexity, twice purporting to [[For the avoidance of doubt|avoid some doubt]] which, had these paragraphs not been added, wouldn’t be there — but boast a lot less forensic interest. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:44, 8 July 2020
Observers will note: in the 2018 Pledge GMSLA there is no equivalent of the 2010 GMSLA’s Paragraph 8.5 dealing with what to do with Letters of Credit, and no equivalent of the 2010 GMSLA’s Paragraph 8.6 requiring the delivery obligations to be reciprocal.
Instead, we assume to bulk out a paragraph which otherwise seems a bit textually anaemic, when drafting paragraph 8 of the 2018 Pledge GMSLA ISLA’s crack drafting squad™ went to town adding a couple of new paragraphs — 8.3 and 8.4 — that boast quite some textual complexity, twice purporting to avoid some doubt which, had these paragraphs not been added, wouldn’t be there — but boast a lot less forensic interest.