|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Two key differences between the {{1992ma}} {{isda92prov|DUST}} and the {{2002ma}} {{isdaprov|DUST}}: The {{2002ma}} version is updated to exclude “defaults” which qualify as mini closeouts under stock loan documentation — a concept which the stock loan market invented after the {{1992ma}} was published, so you can’t really blame {{icds}} for overlooking it at first — as these tend to arise from normal market settlement failures and are not credit-driven, and secondly the criteria for something to count as a repudiation are stiffened to require written evidence from the repudiating party. The latter of these really more am articulation of common sense, for it would be a brave risk officer indeed who closed out an {{isdama}} based on an oral communication, or the proverbial extended middle finger, for which she could not subsequently produce in fairly compelling evidence. But still.
| | {{isda 5(a)(v) comm|isdaprov}} |
| | |
| The [[mini closeout]] point, as we discuss in the commentary below, is technically correct but should have led to a ''simplification'' of the DUST provision, rather than a ''convolution'' of it. I know what you’re thinking, and your right: like ''that'' was ever going to happen.
| |
Latest revision as of 15:32, 24 December 2023
DUST has been expanded in five significant ways by the 2002 ISDA. See the summary and general sections for details.