Template:Special damages capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "These are the direct out-of-pocket costs the innocent party incurs in dealing with the fallout of the breach of its contract and mitigating its loss. So, the £15 commission I..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Special damages]] are [[damages]] the court awards you for the [[Consequential loss|consequential]] or [[indirect loss|indirect losses]] it suffers upon a breach of contract. Compare with [[general damages]] which are the damages a court awards as a result of [[direct loss]]es arising upon a breach of contract. | |||
Remember, folks: “[[damages]]” are payment orders made by a court. You don’t ''suffer'' damages. You get ''paid'' damages if you suffer a ''loss''. Well, an actionable one, any way. | |||
Legal eagles are apt to confuse “losses” and “damages”, probably because “damage” is, in muggle-speak, a synonym for “loss”. In any case: consequential loss, indirect loss, special damages, consequential damages, indirect damages, special loss: ''all the same thing''. |
Latest revision as of 16:05, 4 September 2023
Special damages are damages the court awards you for the consequential or indirect losses it suffers upon a breach of contract. Compare with general damages which are the damages a court awards as a result of direct losses arising upon a breach of contract.
Remember, folks: “damages” are payment orders made by a court. You don’t suffer damages. You get paid damages if you suffer a loss. Well, an actionable one, any way.
Legal eagles are apt to confuse “losses” and “damages”, probably because “damage” is, in muggle-speak, a synonym for “loss”. In any case: consequential loss, indirect loss, special damages, consequential damages, indirect damages, special loss: all the same thing.