Intermediate broker: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Of interest<ref>Professional interest, needless to say.</ref> because: | Of interest<ref>Professional interest, needless to say.</ref> because: | ||
*An [[intermediate broker]] it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under | *An [[intermediate broker]] it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under [[EMIR]] | ||
*It may present a [[RWA|risk-weighting]] problem to you under | *It may present a [[RWA|risk-weighting]] problem to you under [[CRR]] if you don’t pass on all solvency relates losses as contemplated in Art {{crrprov|306(1)(c)}} of that glorious regulation. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Broker]]s and [[dealer]]s | *[[Broker]]s and [[dealer]]s | ||
* | *[[EMIR]] | ||
* | *[[CRR]] | ||
*[[Exchange-traded derivatives]] | *[[Exchange-traded derivatives]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
In the world of exchange-traded instruments, a broker who occupies the dun netherworld between a client-facing executing broker and the exchange or CCP-facing clearing member. May or may not be affiliated with the executing broker.
Of interest[1] because:
- An intermediate broker it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under EMIR
- It may present a risk-weighting problem to you under CRR if you don’t pass on all solvency relates losses as contemplated in Art 306(1)(c) of that glorious regulation.
See also
References
- ↑ Professional interest, needless to say.