Recital: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|bolierplate|}}The legal eagle’s opportunity to tell a bit of a story, using the juridical version of “once upon a time”: WHEREAS:" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a| | {{a|boilerplate|{{image|Storyteller|jpg|I want to tell you a story}}}}A [[legal eagle]]’s nugatory attempt at ''[[design]]''. | ||
WHEREAS: | WHEREAS: | ||
The [[legal eagle]]’s opportunity to tell a bit of a story, using the juridical version of “[[once upon a time]]”: basically, an integrated passage (that, if it doesn’t start with “[[once upon a time]]” or “[[whereas]]” or “[[background]]” is sometimes called a “[[preamble]]”) which leads you into the meat of [[contract]] — or in a perfect world, would do, but the juridical magisterium being what it is — an imperfect fiefdom designed for the pleasure of [[Pedantry|pedant]]s — it will lead you instead into a thicket of [[tedious]] preliminaries. | |||
Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of [[Definitions|definition]]s, matters of [[interpretation]], [[construction]], [[hierarchy of documents]] and superfluous extemporisations on [[Singular|singulars]], [[Plural|plurals]], masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language<ref>Ok: not really that likely yet, but we ''are'' heading that way.</ref> before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Definitions]] | |||
*[[Interpretation]] | |||
*{{isdaprov|Preamble}} under the {{isdama}} | |||
{{ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 24 January 2024
|
Boilerplate Anatomy™
|
A legal eagle’s nugatory attempt at design.
WHEREAS:
The legal eagle’s opportunity to tell a bit of a story, using the juridical version of “once upon a time”: basically, an integrated passage (that, if it doesn’t start with “once upon a time” or “whereas” or “background” is sometimes called a “preamble”) which leads you into the meat of contract — or in a perfect world, would do, but the juridical magisterium being what it is — an imperfect fiefdom designed for the pleasure of pedants — it will lead you instead into a thicket of tedious preliminaries.
Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of definitions, matters of interpretation, construction, hierarchy of documents and superfluous extemporisations on singulars, plurals, masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language[1] before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home.
See also
References
- ↑ Ok: not really that likely yet, but we are heading that way.