Template:M comp disc GMSLA 6.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "There is no specific equivalent in the {{pgmsla}} but the effect of this clause — since it only applies now to Loaned Seciurities and not collateral, so wouldn’t otherwise..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is no specific equivalent in the {{pgmsla}} but the effect of this clause — since it only applies now to Loaned | [[6.1 - GMSLA Provision|There]] is no specific equivalent in the {{pgmsla}} but the effect of this clause — since it only applies now to {{pgmslaprov|Loaned Securities}} and not {{gmslaprov|Collateral}}, so wouldn’t otherwise need to be repeated — is injected into the closing cadences of Clause {{pgmslaprov|6.2}} — a small gesture towards verbal economy that, for once, probably wasn’t worth it, seeing as it throws the numbering out between the {{gmsla}} and the {{pgmsla}}, and makes people starting at the new document for the first time go, “now, why did they remove that bit about withholding on {{pgmslaprov|Income}} payments?”. Answer: they ''didn’t''. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:01, 23 December 2020
There is no specific equivalent in the 2018 Pledge GMSLA but the effect of this clause — since it only applies now to Loaned Securities and not Collateral, so wouldn’t otherwise need to be repeated — is injected into the closing cadences of Clause 6.2 — a small gesture towards verbal economy that, for once, probably wasn’t worth it, seeing as it throws the numbering out between the 2010 GMSLA and the 2018 Pledge GMSLA, and makes people starting at the new document for the first time go, “now, why did they remove that bit about withholding on Income payments?”. Answer: they didn’t.