Recital: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|boilerplate|[[File:Storyteller.jpg|450px|thumb|center|I want to tell you a story]]}}A [[legal eagle]]’s nugatory attempt at ''[[design]]''.  
{{a|boilerplate|{{image|Storyteller|jpg|I want to tell you a story}}}}A [[legal eagle]]’s nugatory attempt at ''[[design]]''.  


WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
Line 9: Line 9:
*[[Definitions]]
*[[Definitions]]
*[[Interpretation]]
*[[Interpretation]]
*{{isdaprov|Preamble}} under the {{isdama}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 18:28, 24 January 2024

Boilerplate Anatomy™
I want to tell you a story
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A legal eagle’s nugatory attempt at design.

WHEREAS:

The legal eagle’s opportunity to tell a bit of a story, using the juridical version of “once upon a time”: basically, an integrated passage (that, if it doesn’t start with “once upon a time” or “whereas” or “background” is sometimes called a “preamble”) which leads you into the meat of contract — or in a perfect world, would do, but the juridical magisterium being what it is — an imperfect fiefdom designed for the pleasure of pedants — it will lead you instead into a thicket of tedious preliminaries.

Thus, having been primed with this tantalising backdrop, expect to spend your next half-hour hacking through a dense undergrowth of definitions, matters of interpretation, construction, hierarchy of documents and superfluous extemporisations on singulars, plurals, masculine, feminine and neuter, and the socio-economic power structures implicit in gendered legal language[1] before you get there, by which time you will be tired, hungry, scratched, possibly injured, desperately needing a pee and really wanting to go home.

See also

References

  1. Ok: not really that likely yet, but we are heading that way.