Template:Efficient language hypothesis capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "The '''efficient language hypothesis''': universally understood advantages in efficiency, clarity, brevity and productivity offered by Plain english|simple, clear and pl..."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''[[efficient language hypothesis]]''': universally understood advantages in efficiency, clarity, brevity and productivity offered by [[Plain english|simple, clear and plain legal drafting]] are so compelling that sustained prolixity is impossible in commercial [[Contract|contracts]], and all bilateral accords will eventually resolve themselves to, at most, terse bullet points rendered on a [[cocktail napkin]], and ideally some kind of [[Financial products Markup Language|mark-up language]] or machine code.
the [[JC]]’s '''[[efficient language hypothesis]]''' states that the universally acknowledged advantages in efficiency, clarity, brevity and productivity offered by [[Plain english|simple, clear and plain legal drafting]] are so compelling that sustained prolixity is impossible in commercial [[Contract|contracts]], and all bilateral accords will eventually resolve themselves to, at most, terse bullet points rendered on a [[cocktail napkin]], and ideally some kind of [[Financial products Markup Language|mark-up language]] or machine code. This, the [[JC]] goes on to conclude, must mean that the commercial world we appear to live in is just a bad dream.

Latest revision as of 20:14, 8 February 2021

the JC’s efficient language hypothesis states that the universally acknowledged advantages in efficiency, clarity, brevity and productivity offered by simple, clear and plain legal drafting are so compelling that sustained prolixity is impossible in commercial contracts, and all bilateral accords will eventually resolve themselves to, at most, terse bullet points rendered on a cocktail napkin, and ideally some kind of mark-up language or machine code. This, the JC goes on to conclude, must mean that the commercial world we appear to live in is just a bad dream.