Passive breach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "A breach of an asset ratio of some kind (the vaunted UCITS 10% concentration limit, or the Regulation T requirement for the a prime broker’s customer to..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A breach of an [[asset]] ratio of some kind (the vaunted [[UCITS]] 10% concentration limit, or the [[Regulation T]] requirement for the a [[prime broker]]’s [[customer]] to have $500,000 in [[liquid]] assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio. | {{a|g|}}A breach of an [[asset]] ratio of some kind (the vaunted [[UCITS]] 10% concentration limit, or the [[Regulation T]] requirement for the a [[prime broker]]’s [[customer]] to have $500,000 in [[liquid]] assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[SEC no-action letter]] and [[Regulation T]] | *[[SEC no-action letter]] and [[Regulation T]] | ||
*[[UCITS]] | *[[UCITS]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:35, 12 February 2021
|
A breach of an asset ratio of some kind (the vaunted UCITS 10% concentration limit, or the Regulation T requirement for the a prime broker’s customer to have $500,000 in liquid assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio.