Template:M comp disc 2018 CSD 1(c): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[1(c) - IM CSD Provision|This]] is, remarkably, even less elegant at doing the same job that Para 1(b) does in the {{vmcsa}}. I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found self-confidence, and eschewed the elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”.
[[1(c) - IM CSD Provision|This]] is, remarkably, an even ''less'' elegant means of achieving the same thing that Para {{vmcsaprov|1(b)}} does in the {{vmcsa}} that [[the squad]] managed in 2016.


Why do you do this to your reading public,. {{icds}}?
I don’t know what happened to {{icds}} between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found mojo, timidly eschewing the (''cough'') elegant “the {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transactions}} specified in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|11}}” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant {{imcsdprov|Covered Transactions (IM)}} specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph {{imcsdprov|13}}”.
 
Why do you do this to your reading public, {{icds}}?

Latest revision as of 09:24, 21 April 2021

This is, remarkably, an even less elegant means of achieving the same thing that Para 1(b) does in the 2016 VM CSA that the squad managed in 2016.

I don’t know what happened to ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ between 2016 and 2018, but it somehow lost its new-found mojo, timidly eschewing the (cough) elegant “the Covered Transactions specified in Paragraph 11” in favour of the more pedestrian — and I have in mind a drunk pedestrian, navigating the median strip of a busy motorway after nightfall — “the relevant Covered Transactions (IM) specified in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 13”.

Why do you do this to your reading public, ISDA’s crack drafting squad™?