Extraordinary rendition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|plainenglish| | {{a|plainenglish|{{image|Moules|png|Not a [[company]], yesterday.}} | ||
}}{{d|Extraordinary rendition|/ɪksˈtrɔːdnri/ /rɛnˈdɪʃən/|n}}<br> | |||
}} | |||
Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN convention against the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of language. | |||
{{ | {{icds}} are past masters, of course — the {{imcsd}} is a high watermark — but an interesting recent case was [[Clifford Chance]] [[Luxembourg lawyer|Luxembourg]]’s ''non''-definition — what we like to call a “[[definisn’t]]” — of “[[Company|companies]]” in its 2021 [[GMRA]] [[netting opinion]] (where else?). | ||
Here our learned colleagues, having devoted hundreds of words to what Luxembourg companies ''are'', then embarked on hundreds more musing, in excruciating detail, on what they are ''not''. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Definisn’t]] | |||
*[[Netting opinion]] | |||
*[[Luxembourg lawyer]] | |||
{{ref}} |
Latest revision as of 13:44, 27 February 2023
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
Extraordinary rendition
/ɪksˈtrɔːdnri/ /rɛnˈdɪʃən/ (n.)
Legal drafting that is so convoluted as to violate the UN convention against the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of language.
ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ are past masters, of course — the 2018 English law IM CSD is a high watermark — but an interesting recent case was Clifford Chance Luxembourg’s non-definition — what we like to call a “definisn’t” — of “companies” in its 2021 GMRA netting opinion (where else?).
Here our learned colleagues, having devoted hundreds of words to what Luxembourg companies are, then embarked on hundreds more musing, in excruciating detail, on what they are not.