Redefinitions: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|plainenglish|}}In the same way that {{author|Douglas Adams}} and John Lloyd ingeniously recycled underused place-names and introduced them into the language, showing prescient instinct for ecological conservation, so nowadays do our celebrities take existing ideas that have fallen out of favour and re-fashion the words describing them to suit the modern vernacular, breathing new life into dead old words. We are all, of course, familiar with the reworking of “[[humble]]” in the hands of LinkedIn opinionistas — no one is humble in the old sense anymore, so we might as well re-craft a perfectly sound phonic to mean something else — and the [[JC]] will gather other examples in our butterfly-net as we doom-ramble around the world wide web. Do write in ([mailto:enquiries@jollycontrarian.com by email], [[Twitter]] (@ContrarianJolly) or owl | {{a|plainenglish| | ||
[[File:Hollywood hermit.png|450px|frameless|center]] | |||
}}In the same way that {{author|Douglas Adams}} and John Lloyd ingeniously recycled underused place-names and introduced them into the language, showing prescient instinct for ecological conservation, so nowadays do our celebrities take existing ideas that have fallen out of favour and re-fashion the words describing them to suit the modern vernacular, breathing new life into dead old words. We are all, of course, familiar with the reworking of “[[humble]]” in the hands of LinkedIn opinionistas — no one is humble in the old sense anymore, so we might as well re-craft a perfectly sound phonic to mean something else — and the [[JC]] will gather other examples in our butterfly-net as we doom-ramble around the world wide web. Do write in ([mailto:enquiries@jollycontrarian.com by email], [[Twitter]] ([https://twitter.com/ContrarianJolly @ContrarianJolly]) or owl) if you find any. | |||
So, for the record: | |||
{{quote| | |||
'''Hermit''' /ˈhɜːmɪt/ (''n''.) | |||
One so withdrawn and emotionally battered by the cruel vicissitudes of celebrity as to be compelled to submit to a photoshoot and air one’s personal problems in the colour supplement to a national daily newspaper. | One so withdrawn and emotionally battered by the cruel vicissitudes of celebrity as to be compelled to submit to a photoshoot and air one’s personal problems in the colour supplement to a national daily newspaper. | ||
:“''[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/paul-hollywood-i-dont-trust-people-now-im-a-hermit-l0z8jcmd3 I don’t trust people now. I’m a hermit]''”. Paul Hollywood, ''The Times'' Magazine, Saturday 28 May 2022. | :“''[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/paul-hollywood-i-dont-trust-people-now-im-a-hermit-l0z8jcmd3 I don’t trust people now. I’m a hermit]''”. Paul Hollywood, ''The Times'' Magazine, Saturday 28 May 2022. | ||
'''A basic right to privacy''' /ə ˈbeɪsɪk raɪt tuː ˈprɪvəsi/ (''n'') | |||
The compulsion to air (i) personal affronts and grievances (ii) one’s own desperate need to be left alone, before the world, at length, to the internationally syndicated media conglomerates. | |||
: [https://www.insider.com/meghan-markle-right-to-privacy-oprah-interview-2021-3 Megan Markle tells Oprah she just wants her basic right to privacy] ''Insider.com'' 9 March 2021. | |||
:[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c2071a34-e8a7-11ec-91b1-7bfb0a33d3d9 “Why is privacy so important to you”] Paul Hollywood (yes, him again) tells ''The Times'' T2 Section, less than a fortnight after his hermitry confession, 10 June 2022. | |||
'''To invade one’s ~''' | |||
To launch legal action in courts half a world away from one’s present domicile over 20-year-old grievances no-one cares about in an effort to “keep one’s name out of the paper” thereby invading the right of millions of Times readers to enjoy their breakfast uninterrupted by one’s entitled boatrace. | |||
:''[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/5e4cb988-02f8-11ee-9bf2-8ca4db35d928 Prince Harry case: duke is first royal to give evidence for 130 years]''}} | |||
{{Sa}} | |||
{{c|Dictionary}} |
Latest revision as of 05:53, 6 June 2023
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
In the same way that Douglas Adams and John Lloyd ingeniously recycled underused place-names and introduced them into the language, showing prescient instinct for ecological conservation, so nowadays do our celebrities take existing ideas that have fallen out of favour and re-fashion the words describing them to suit the modern vernacular, breathing new life into dead old words. We are all, of course, familiar with the reworking of “humble” in the hands of LinkedIn opinionistas — no one is humble in the old sense anymore, so we might as well re-craft a perfectly sound phonic to mean something else — and the JC will gather other examples in our butterfly-net as we doom-ramble around the world wide web. Do write in (by email, Twitter (@ContrarianJolly) or owl) if you find any.
So, for the record:
Hermit /ˈhɜːmɪt/ (n.)
One so withdrawn and emotionally battered by the cruel vicissitudes of celebrity as to be compelled to submit to a photoshoot and air one’s personal problems in the colour supplement to a national daily newspaper.
- “I don’t trust people now. I’m a hermit”. Paul Hollywood, The Times Magazine, Saturday 28 May 2022.
A basic right to privacy /ə ˈbeɪsɪk raɪt tuː ˈprɪvəsi/ (n)
The compulsion to air (i) personal affronts and grievances (ii) one’s own desperate need to be left alone, before the world, at length, to the internationally syndicated media conglomerates.
- Megan Markle tells Oprah she just wants her basic right to privacy Insider.com 9 March 2021.
- “Why is privacy so important to you” Paul Hollywood (yes, him again) tells The Times T2 Section, less than a fortnight after his hermitry confession, 10 June 2022.
To invade one’s ~
To launch legal action in courts half a world away from one’s present domicile over 20-year-old grievances no-one cares about in an effort to “keep one’s name out of the paper” thereby invading the right of millions of Times readers to enjoy their breakfast uninterrupted by one’s entitled boatrace.