From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Settlement Disruption Event - Emissions Annex Provision|Oft]] mentioned in a similar breath to a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}}, a Settlement Disruption Event is one of the external events which leads to a suspension of obligations, pending the lifting of the disruption, that are set out in Paragraph {{euaprov|(d)(i)(4)}} of the {{emissionsannex}}.
| |
|
| |
|
| There is a wonderful [[nested uncertainty avoidance device]] buried in the redundant second paragraph, which effectively says, for the avoidance of doubt, this avoidance of doubt paragraph is intended to avoid doubt, and not actually change anything. Here [[Ourobos]] reaches around and eats its own tail: a clause which appears to do something — for why else in a competently-composed passage would it be there? — appears to be there simply to deny its own ''raison d’etre''.
| |
Latest revision as of 13:46, 27 June 2022