Template:M summ EUA Annex Abandonment of Scheme: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "What happens if, in its infinite wisdom, the European Union decides that an emissions trading scheme is a silly idea and we should just embrace a future as Venusians or someth..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What happens if, in its infinite wisdom, the European Union decides that an | [[Abandonment of Scheme - Emissions Annex Provision|What]] happens if, in its infinite wisdom, the European Union decides that an {{euaprov|Emissions Trading Scheme}} is a silly idea and we should just embrace a future as Venusians, or Scottish vintners or something similar. You may see people tinker around with this — our favourite is “... or there is a proposal to abandon the {{euaprov|Scheme}}... ” which given its looseness (there’s always some wingnut from a minority in an some oil-burning pressure group proposing something like that) and the lack of consequences beyond the transaction should it happen or not happen — it isn’t like it is an illegality or something where you can go to prison if you blithely carry on — there really seems no sensible call for this. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:42, 19 May 2023
What happens if, in its infinite wisdom, the European Union decides that an Emissions Trading Scheme is a silly idea and we should just embrace a future as Venusians, or Scottish vintners or something similar. You may see people tinker around with this — our favourite is “... or there is a proposal to abandon the Scheme... ” which given its looseness (there’s always some wingnut from a minority in an some oil-burning pressure group proposing something like that) and the lack of consequences beyond the transaction should it happen or not happen — it isn’t like it is an illegality or something where you can go to prison if you blithely carry on — there really seems no sensible call for this.