Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 2(d): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Replaced content with "{{isda 2(d) summ|isdaprov}}"
Tag: Replaced
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} does the following:
{{isda 2(d) summ|isdaprov}}
*'''Net obligation''': if a counterparty suffers withholding it generally doesn’t have to gross up – it just remits tax to the revenue and pays net.
*'''Refund obligation where tax subsequently levied''': if a counterparty pays gross and subsequently is levied the tax, the recipient must refund an equivalent amount to the tax.
*'''{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}''': the one exception is “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” - this is tax arises as a result of the payer’s own status vis-à-vis the withholding jurisdiction. In that case the payer has to gross up, courtesy of a magnificent [[quintuple negative]].
{{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}} reimbursement obligations are covered at {{isdaprov|4(e)}}, not here.

Latest revision as of 14:44, 21 September 2023

Section 2(d) does the following:

  • Net obligation: if a counterparty suffers withholding it generally doesn’t have to gross up – it just remits tax to the revenue and pays net.
  • Refund obligation where tax subsequently levied: if a counterparty pays gross and subsequently is levied the tax, the recipient must refund an equivalent amount to the tax.
  • Indemnifiable Tax: the one exception is “Indemnifiable Tax” - this is tax arises as a result of the payer’s own status vis-à-vis the withholding jurisdiction. In that case the payer has to gross up, courtesy of a magnificent quintuple negative.

Stamp Tax reimbursement obligations are covered at 4(e), not here.

News from the pedantry front

Happy news, readers: we have a report from the front lines in the battle between substance and form. The JC asked no lesser a tax ninja than Dan Neidle — quietly, the JC is a bit of a fan — the following question:

In the statement, “X may make a deduction or withholding from any payment for or on account of any tax” is there any difference between “deducting” and “withholding”?

They seem to be exact synonyms.

Likewise, “for” vs. “on account of”?

We are pleased to report Mr N opined[1] replied:

I don’t think there’s a difference. Arguably it’s done for clarity, because people normally say “withholding tax” but technically there’s no such thing — it’s a deduction of income tax.

Which is good enough for me. So all of that “shall be entitled to make a deduction or withholding from any payment which it makes pursuant to this agreement for or on account of any Tax” can be scattered to the four winds. Henceforth the JC is going with:

X may deduct Tax from any payment it makes under this Agreement.