Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 9(h): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "{{isda 9(h) comp|isdaprov}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''There is no strict equivalent to Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} in the {{1992ma}}. But see Section {{isda92prov|2(e)}}, which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing.
{{isda 9(h) comp|isdaprov}}
 
Friends of the [[JC]] will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always ''bad'', of course — it can be quite ''good'', in fact, characterising as it does the sum total of the [[JC]]’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case it leaves something to the ''imagination'' and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies every now and then, don’t we?
 
Besides, as you may come to see as you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details leads you directly into the “{{isia}}” file.
 
Are you sorry yet? Well, you ''did'' ask.

Latest revision as of 10:20, 5 January 2024

There is no strict equivalent to Section 9(h) in the 1992 ISDA. But see Section 2(e), which is a half-arsed attempt at the same thing.

Friends of the JC will know that “half-arsed” isn’t always bad, of course — it can be quite good, in fact — characterising, as it does, the sum total of the JC’s paltry achievements on this barren rock — and in any case, it leaves something to the imagination and we all like a little private intellectual space to indulge our whims and fantasies every now and then, don’t we?

As you step through this monstrosity, going to town on devilish details as it does, you may find it leads you directly into the “I’m sorry I asked” file.

Are you sorry yet? Well, you did ask.