Template:Isda law comp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "We are close to the turtles, here, ladies and gentlemen. The {{icds}} definition of the {{{{{1}}}|law}} is as interesting for what it does not say as what it does, and all rounded out nicely by that sweetly ambivalent includes. Not means; just includes. So — you know..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We are close to the [[Elephants and turtles|turtles]], here, ladies and gentlemen. The {{icds}} definition of the {{{{{1}}}|law}} is as interesting for what it does not say as what it does, and all rounded out nicely by that sweetly ambivalent includes. Not means; just includes. So — you know... | We are close to the [[Elephants and turtles|turtles]], here, ladies and gentlemen. The {{icds}} definition of the “{{{{{1}}}|law}}” is as interesting for what it does not say as what it does, and all rounded out nicely by that sweetly ambivalent includes. Not ''[[means]]''; just ''[[Incluso|includes]]''. | ||
So — well, you know... | |||
Latest revision as of 14:31, 23 June 2023
We are close to the turtles, here, ladies and gentlemen. The ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ definition of the “{{{{{1}}}|law}}” is as interesting for what it does not say as what it does, and all rounded out nicely by that sweetly ambivalent includes. Not means; just includes.
So — well, you know...