Template:M summ IETA 5.1(d): Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "In its yen to over-specify and state the obvious, the {{ietama}} almost trips itself up: ''obviously'' the {{isdaprov|Transfer}} can’t be complete until the Allowances have arrived in the {{isdaprov|Receiving Party}}’s {{isdaprov|Holding Account}} (and, for the record, the no encumbrances condition of Clause {{isdaprov|5.3}} is complied with); and it is true the ''risk of loss'' of the ''actually transferred'' {{isdaprov|Period Traded Allowance}}s only shifts at that..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In its yen to over-specify and state the obvious, the {{ietama}} almost trips itself up: ''obviously'' the {{ | In its yen to over-specify and state the obvious, the {{ietama}} almost trips itself up: ''obviously'' the {{ietaprov|Transfer}} can’t be complete until the Allowances have arrived in the {{ietaprov|Receiving Party}}’s {{ietaprov|Holding Account}} (and, for the record, the no encumbrances condition of Clause {{ietaprov|5.3}} is complied with); and it is true the ''risk of loss'' of the ''actually transferred'' {{ietaprov|Period Traded Allowance}}s only shifts at that point, but do note the other risks associated with the generic class of {{ietaprov|Allowance}}s being sold: economic ones, market value, abandonment of scheme risks and so on — transfer ''at the moment of trade''. | ||
This is something that practitioners in the carbon market seem confused about. | This is something that practitioners in the carbon market seem confused about. | ||
And as for that “whereupon” — well, see our [[jc:Primary Obligation - IETA Provision|premium section]] for more on that. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:41, 18 July 2023
In its yen to over-specify and state the obvious, the IETA Master Agreement almost trips itself up: obviously the Transfer can’t be complete until the Allowances have arrived in the Receiving Party’s Holding Account (and, for the record, the no encumbrances condition of Clause 5.3 is complied with); and it is true the risk of loss of the actually transferred Period Traded Allowances only shifts at that point, but do note the other risks associated with the generic class of Allowances being sold: economic ones, market value, abandonment of scheme risks and so on — transfer at the moment of trade.
This is something that practitioners in the carbon market seem confused about.
And as for that “whereupon” — well, see our premium section for more on that.