Template:First law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:(ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero. | :(ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero. | ||
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br> | :(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br> | ||
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} | This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} asserted its incoherence through his maxim “[[convenimus ergo es]]”).<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 2 September 2023
The JC’s first law of worker entropy (also known as the “meeting paradox”):
- (i) The probability of a meeting starting on time can never be 100%;
- (ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.
- (iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be.
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since Otto Büchstein asserted its incoherence through his maxim “convenimus ergo es”).