Template:Emissions EEP overview: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Emissions Excess Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Emissions | {{emissions same comp|Excess Emissions Penalty}} | ||
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Excess Emissions Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho. | |||
Latest revision as of 14:26, 17 October 2023
The definition of Excess Emissions Penalty is more or less the same in all three emissions trading documentation regimes. Compare:
ISDA: Excess Emissions Penalty
IETA: Excess Emissions Penalty
EFET: Excess Emissions Penalty
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Excess Emissions Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho.