Template:Isda 4 summ: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out. ==== Section {{isdaprov|4(a)}} Furnish Specified Information==== {{specified information capsule|{{{1}}}}} ==== Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}} Maintain Aut..."
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out.
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t).
==== Section {{isdaprov|4(a)}} Furnish Specified Information====
 
{{specified information capsule|{{{1}}}}}
These are the ''dull'' agreements — which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out.
==== Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}} Maintain Authorisations====
{{isda 4(b) summ|{{{1}}}}}
==== Section {{isdaprov|4(c)}} Comply with Laws ====
{{isda 4(c) summ|{{{1}}}}}
====Section {{isdaprov|4(d)}} Tax Agreement====
{{isda 4(d) summ|{{{1}}}}}
====Section {{isdaprov|4(e)}} Payment of Stamp Tax====
{{isda 4(e) summ|{{{1}}}}}

Latest revision as of 13:20, 7 September 2024

A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t).

These are the dull agreements — which by and large don’t justify close-out.