Incluso definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|construction|}}The incluso is already a tool in the legal eagle’s box to aid construction — you don’t embark on a parenthesised explanation of what specific things you have in mind when enunciating a general one ''other than'' by way of aid to interpretation — so we should be disappointed, but not surprised, that assiduous draftspeople would like to separately tell us that including bears its natural, everyday meaning, and not some other, limiting, ''contrary..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|construction|}}The incluso is already a tool in the legal | {{a|construction|}}The [[incluso]] is already a tool in the [[legal eagle]]’s box to aid [[construction]] — you don’t embark on a parenthesised explanation of what specific things you want to capture when enunciating a general one ''other than'' by way of aid to interpretation — so we should be disappointed, but not surprised, that assiduous draftspeople would like to separately tell us that when we say “including” the word bears its natural, everyday meaning, and not some other, limiting, ''contrary'' meaning to the phrase. Including is not the end of it, that is to say; just because I mention some examples of what this general thing is, that does not mean there are not other examples I would like to keep open. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Boilerplate]] | |||
*[[Incluso]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 18 October 2023
|
Interpretation and construction boilerplate anatomy™
|
The incluso is already a tool in the legal eagle’s box to aid construction — you don’t embark on a parenthesised explanation of what specific things you want to capture when enunciating a general one other than by way of aid to interpretation — so we should be disappointed, but not surprised, that assiduous draftspeople would like to separately tell us that when we say “including” the word bears its natural, everyday meaning, and not some other, limiting, contrary meaning to the phrase. Including is not the end of it, that is to say; just because I mention some examples of what this general thing is, that does not mean there are not other examples I would like to keep open.